Strong and stable Government

It’s clear that Britain needs a strong and stable government that can govern in the national interest.

Liberal Democrat negotiators in Parliament have been working hard on some difficult and important talks. In forming a Government, our commitments to fairness and a stable economy are paramount, as is our commitment to overhaul Britain’s rotten political system. It is also – as my mailbox reminds me – important for politicians to enter this important time in a spirit of openness. While Nick Clegg and his negotiating team need support to conclude their discussions successfully, it is important that people are reassured that the talks are being pursued with the national interest in mind.

That’s why, at this stage, I believe there is no longer anything to be gained in pursuing the leads from a Labour Party that has decisively lost the election and which has been shown to be weak, divided and unable to submit to compromise on a number of key issues. An alliance with Labour, even if it included other parties, would be neither stable nor strong. The verdict of the electorate means that any Government that did not include the Conservative Party would be exceptionally weak.

It’s clear that it’s in the national interest that these discussions should not continue for longer than is absolutely necessary.

On electoral reform, Labour has shown in the past that it cannot be trusted. Therefore any offers it makes must be treated with considerable scepticism, however they may sound. A minority of its MPs are already publicly undermining attempts to reach consensus on this issue. While I do not believe the Alternative Vote system, promised as a referendum option by the Conservatives, is a sufficient step towards a system that reflects the will and choice of the electorate, it is nonetheless a step towards fairness and a significant offer by the Conservatives.

Given the urgent importance of achieving economic stability and stable government in the national interest, I hope the Liberal Democrats nationally will now move to swiftly conclude an agreement that will give the country the stable government we need, with significant safeguards to entrench fairness in that government. I hope we are now indeed in that final phase.

Read full storyComments { 1 }

Love Democracy… Get out and vote today

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Transparent Government

Big Ben

Recently I got an e-mail about lobbying transparency from William Goring who runs iwishiknew.org.  William has written to all the Prospective Parliamentary Candidates in Reading East about the 38Degrees lobbying pledge which calls for a statutory register of lobbying activity.

Of the 4 candidates in Reading East that William wrote to, only 2 – including myself – actually signed the pledge (you can read all about it at his site), but in particular I was happy to point out that many years ago I was personally involved in campaigning and winning support within the Liberal Democrats for a compulsory register of lobbying activity. Thankfully, William thought that mine was:

… the best of a good bunch of responses.

But transparency in Government goes further than lobbying, especially considering the recent expenses scandal, and that is why I backed the Kelly Report on the reform of MPs’ expenses in full and why I openly pledged not to take a second home as Reading East’s MP, and why I also committed to publishing all my expenses.

I have also pledged to be a full-time MP with no second jobs or directorships…. can that be said of the others?

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Lib Dem TV interview

Sometime in late March I was interviewed in Reading Station by Mark Thompson (of Mark Reckons blog fame) for Lib Dem TV.  How my Glee Club habit became common knowledge, I’ll never know!

Read full storyComments { 0 }

A short word about the Digital Economy Bill

Digital Economy Wordle cloud

David Miller runs his own blog, Deadpan Sincerity.  He emailed me regarding the Digital Economy Act and I was happy to reply as I’ve had a lot of discussions about this with various people in Reading East.

Liberal Democrats have a number of concerns about the content of the bill, reflected in the emergency motion we passed at our  Spring conference especially in terms of web blocking and disconnection, not to mention the way the DE bill was passed in the ‘wash up’.

Read my full reply which Mr. Miller very kindly published on his blog. In the spirit of fair play, you can also read the reply which the Conservative candidate for Reading East sent to Mr. Miller. In his reply to the Conservative candidate, Mr. Miller makes the central point that I cannot help but agree with.

Being in opposition to a government with a majority does not absolve you of your democratic responsibilities

UPDATE 28th April 2010: By some strange coincidence, Redlands Ward Councillor Glen Goodall also blogged about the DE Bill. Clearly this is an big issue for many people and the Liberal Democrat stance is quite clear.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Somewhere Between Hope and Fear

As “Cleggmania” shows little sign of subsiding after two of the three leaders’ debates have come and gone, it is clear that all three main parties have a huge challenge on their hands in attempts to get their messages across.  But whilst the two older parties have focused on  peddling the language of fear, the Liberal Democrats are simply doing and saying the same things we always did.

On the surface of it, Labour most wants us to fear returning a Conservative government if we vote Liberal Democrat, and above all else the Conservatives want us to fear a hung parliament as this, they say, will lead to a weak, dithering government, and in turn “the markets” will turn against our country leading to a downward economic spiral.  Both these points seek to exclude even the possibility that Liberal Democrat policies make sense.  They don’t actually tackle the ideas of the policies being questioned, but seek explicitly to place them in a context of fear.

The two old parties are not trying to earn your vote through a battle of policies, but through promoting a fear of anybody but them, and of anything but their policies. However, the only context in which I feel you should view the Liberal Democrats is a context of hope.

The central fears of both the Conservative and Labour party are actually two sides of the same coin. If your party has the most to gain from a dusty old First Past The Post (FPTP) system then it’s odds on that you’ll defend that system to the hilt.  Similarly, if your party is vehemently and ideologically opposed to another party, taking advantage of the technicalities of the FPTP system in order to argue that voting for what you want might result in you getting something else surely demonstrates that the FPTP system has past it’s sell by date.

In truth the fear which being projected onto us by the old parties is simply the logical manifestations of their own ideological dogmas.  Don’t want a Conservative government? Vote Labour!  Want a “strong” government? Vote Conservative, it’s their turn this time around, isn’t it?  These oblique arguments are an attempt to mask the fact that the current system does not represent the interests of the public, but the interests of a narrow band of politicians.

If nothing else, this election has turned the spotlight on this ongoing charade, and highlighted the fact that it is the Liberal Democrats who have been pushing for a fairer Proportional Representation (PR) system for the UK.

Across Europe proportional representation is in fact the norm, and we would do well to note that having a ‘hung’ parliament (the term ‘balanced parliament’ does seem more appropriate) in Germany has not led to a complete implosion of the political system.  Quite the opposite.  Germany is coping well with the Global recession.  On the other hand, if we look to Greece, we see a version of FPTP where the leading party needs to control at least 151 seats of a 300 seat parliament to command power. Why has this not saved Greece from recently going cap in hand to the IMF?  So much for markets requiring an authoritarian government to inspire inward investment!

Analysis indicates that being in a “safe” seat seems to make it more likely that an MP is embroiled in expenses scandals.  A PR system would abolish safe seats and will ensure that your MP will work hard for you and not expect an easy ride at election time.

The Liberal Democrats have championed the electoral reform required to send power from politicians to the voting public, both in terms of offering a PR system, and also in terms of reforming the House of Lords to be a fully-elected second chamber.  The Liberal Democrats also think you should have the right to sack corrupt MPs.  These are the things a liberal democracy requires, and which the Liberal Democrats have been seeking for years and which only now the older parties are addressing head on, whether they agree with us or not.

And because we don’t see MPs and electoral reform and cleaning up politics as being in a vacuum from the current economic turmoil, Liberal Democrats propose to reduce the number of MPs by 150.  The mantra of “more for less” is being applied across the country, why should politicians be exempt?

The old parties tell you that they are offering change, but fundamentally, they want to stick to the same tired politics and the same dusty system. The Liberal Democrats offer real hope and real ideas for change, and change should be embraced, not feared.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

I believe in…

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Mail on Sunday puts Lib Dems in the lead

'Labservative' election posterYou know that when even The Mail on Sunday is conceding that the Liberal Democrats have a huge lead in the polls that the political landscape of the UK is changing. But that is exactly what is happening. A survey by BPIX which The Mail on Sundays calls “the most authoritative conducted since the televised debate” tells us that:

…support for the Lib Dems has soared to 32 per cent, one point ahead of the Conservatives on 31, with Labour trailing third at 28.

This radically reverses the trend of a 7% Conservative lead highlighted by BPIX surveys in The Mail on Sunday on April 11th, just days before the debate on April 15th, and on March 28th.

These surveys prove that when Liberal Democrats are given a chance to fairly explain our policies we can demonstrate that there are big differences between what the duoploy of another 5 years of ‘Labservative’ rule offers, and what a Liberal Democrat government offers.

Those nay-sayers who think that this is merely a blip on the radar before things return to a more comfortable – for the old parties at least! – and “normal ordering” of parties have only to look at the increased energy and momentum that has already been carried by the Liberal Democrats over the weekend and into a new campaigning week.

Yes, nationally, but specifically here in Reading East there has been a renewed passion and enthusiasm as Lib Dem activists campaigned over the weekend. As a local party we have had a tremendous uplift.

Other parties might have large donations from wealthy individuals who may or may not be domiciled in the UK for tax purposes, or tithes from militant unions, the Liberal Democrats do not have those luxuries and cannot afford the complacency that goes with them, that’s why we spend less time on pithy attacks on other parties and people, and more time communicating with the people to whom we are accountable.

We should not forget the context in which the current Liberal Democrat poll lead should be placed.

An early indication that the Liberal Democrats will be more of a headache for the two older parties came when Vince Cable was hailed as the winner of the Channel 4 Chancellors Debate in late March. That Nick did so well in the Prime Ministerial debate is being attributed to the idea that he was someone “new” who we’d “never heard of”, and he had “the least to lose”, but for weeks even Liberal Democrats have been chuckling to all the jokes on prime-time radio and TV programmes about “who is Nick Clegg?”. It’s funny, but those jokes aren’t being made anymore.

Now, rightfully, there is an aura of seriousness surrounding the Liberal Democrats. We have more conviction in ourselves and our policies, and, increasingly, so do the people that matter – the voting public.

There are two more debates to go. The excuses about having “the least to lose” and that Nick Clegg came off the best was because he was “new” to the public will begin to hold less and less water as Liberal Democrat policies begin to be probed deeper and are revealed to – literally if you check the figures in our manifesto – add up.

Nick Clegg was right to say the day after the debate that Lib Dems have “earned the right to be heard”. And on issues like the economy, like health, like education, like the Trident replacement system and ID cards we will be heard more and more of over the next few critical weeks.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Epps welcomes manifesto of “fairness and honesty”

Gareth Epps and Nick Clegg MP

Gareth Epps and Nick Clegg MP

Gareth Epps, Liberal Democrat Parliamentary candidate for Reading East, has welcomed the launch of the Liberal Democrats’ General Election manifesto.

The manifesto sets out four clearer steps to a fairer Britain:

  • Fair taxes that put money back in your pocket: the first £10,000 you earn tax-free, and a tax cut for £700 for most people, freeing 3.6 million low earners and pensioners from income tax completely
  • A fair chance for every child, investing £2.5 million (and millions of pounds in Reading East) tackling educational inequality, ensuring children get the attention they need, and phasing out university tuition fees;
  • A fair future; creating jobs by making Britain greener, offering young people ways out of unemployment;
  • A fair deal by cleaning up politics; putting trust back by putting power back into people’s hands and completely overhauling Westminster with fair votes, an elected House of Lords and all politicians paying full British taxes.

(more…)

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Lib Dems Launch Campaign With Challenge To Tories: ‘Face the voters’

Gareth Epps

Liberal Democrat Parliamentary candidate Cllr Gareth Epps has launched the General Election campaign in Reading East with a direct challenge to his Conservative opponent to face the electorate at forthcoming public meetings in Reading.
(more…)

Read full storyComments { 2 }